"Growth Hormone Deficient Patients After Traumatic Brain Injury - Baseline Characteristics and Benefits After Growth Hormone Replacement - An Analysis of the German KIMS Database." I. Kreitschmann-Andermahr, E.M. Poll, A. Reineke, J.M. Gilsbach, G. Brabant, M. Buchfelder, W. Faßbender, M. Faust, P.H Kann, and H. Wallaschofski. Growth Hormone and IGF Research. 18(2008) : 472-478.
Figure 1: The Main Causes of TBI and Head Injuries (click here to enlarge).
Figure 2: Pituitary Gland and Relationship to Hypothalamus
Introduction:
Growth hormone is necessary for many everyday bodily functions including, growth, metabolism, reproduction, etc. Therefore, it is important to ensure that you have sufficient growth hormone in the body at any given time. Many factors can influence the production and release of growth hormone, especially when the pituitary is affected, as it is the anterior pituitary where growth hormone is secreted. In recent evidence, it has been shown that patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) can suffer from growth hormone deficiency (GHD). This occurs due to hypothalamic-pituitary disturbances. Multiple studies have shown that the most frequent and common pituitary abnormality following TBI is a severe GHD.
Figure 3: Symptoms of TBI and Head Injuries (click here to enlarge).
Purpose:
The purpose of the paper being critiqued was to characterize adult TBI patients suffering from GHD and determine the effect of human growth hormone replacement in these patients. The patients were to be taken from the German Pfizer International Metabolic Database (KIMS). This database is an international pharmacoepidemiologic survey that is designed to monitor growth hormone replacement therapy in growth hormone deficient adults to ensure their safety.
Methods:
The KIMS database was searched for eligible patients for the study in question. These patients must have had perinatal head injury, head trauma and/or TBI. A total of 84 patients fit these circumstances out of a total of 2208 patients that were in the KIMS database at that time (October, 2006). All 84 patients, regardless of the specific head injury, were classified as having TBI due to the small sub-group populations. Each of the 84 TBI patients were matched with 84 GHD patients that were also in the KIMS database. However, their GHD was not due to TBI, but rather non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA).
Figure 4: Pituitary Tumor in Brain (click here to enlarge)
"True naive" patients were classified as those whom had never before received human growth hormone replacement. "Semi-naive" patients were those whose human growth hormone replacement had stopped no less than six months prior to entry into the KIMS database, and finally, "non-naive" patients had continuous human growth hormone replacements before and after entry into the KIMS database.
The 84 patients whos GHD was due to TBI were divided into two groups: (1) the onset of GHD before the age of 18 and (2) the onset of GHD after the age of 18. At entry into the KIMS database, all patients were compared based on a variety of clinical characteristics, including height, weight, BMI, quality of life, etc. Serum IGF-1 levels were determined using radioimmunoassay. Serum concentrations of total cholesterol was also measured.Data from all TBI patients that had at least a one year follow up after entry into KIMS was analyzed to view the effect of human growth hormone replacement therapy in TBI patients. These results were compared to the clinical characteristics obtained before entry into the KIMS database. As well, the results were compared to NFPA patients.
Results & Discussion:
Patients with GHD onset during childhood were reported to be much shorter in height than GHD patients with adult onset. Following a one year follow-up in 61GHD TBI and NFPA patients, some notable changes were observed. The GH-dose, along with the IGF-1 SDS increased significantly. In NFPA patients only, a decrease was observed in LDL-cholesterol. Quality of life improved as well in both groups. Since a considerable amount of time had passed since the initial injury and the time of the study, this improvement cannot be caused only by the recovery process, but can be regarded as a treatment effect. This hypothesis was further validated in 2006, when a study published showed that TBI patients with growth hormone insufficiency showed a higher rate of depression and a lower quality of lift that did the TBI patients that did not portray growth hormone insufficiency.
Conclusion:
This evaluation of the German KIMS database portrays that TBI and NFPA patients with GHD have increased quality of life and other benefits from human growth hormone replacement therapy. As well, the shorter height of TBI patients with childhood onset GHD in combination with a postponed diagnosis and treatment results in shorter stature of the individuals. Although all 84 of these patients exhibited hypopituitarism, many victims of traumatic head injuries also suffer from this condition, and it sadly goes unnoticed.
Critique:
This paper was very clear, and its objectives were straightforward. The information provided was concise and pertained to the question at hand. I feel that the baseline characteristics at the beginning provided readers with a good idea of what the initial conditions were, before the human growth hormone replacement therapy. The purpose of the paper to provide an outlook of the effect of replacement therapy in TBI patients was proven to improve some aspects, including quality of life.
There were not many figures in the paper, however, the one that was provided did a phenomenal job at portraying the information clearly and concisely. The amount of information that was provided assisted in relaying the message, however, was not too complicated that it became confusing. The tables that were provided assisted in portraying statistics for the clinical characteristics, and were good at visually representing comparisons and contrasts between TBI and NFPA groups.
I do feel however, that the results would be more reliable had a bigger sample size been used, rather than 84. Also, I feel that the results may be somewhat inaccurate due to the fact that only patients from Germany were included in the study. There may be aspects of the gene pool that was used that would result in observations and conditions that may not occur worldwide, and in other areas. It is necessary in an experiment to try and cover all angles, rather than an isolated location. Overall, I feel the paper provided some interesting results and conclusions.
Future Experiments:
Future experiments for this study could include a larger sample size. Although 84 patients is a fairly big sample, the results would be more concrete if more patients were studied.
Also, regions other than Germany should be included in future studies. This can not only increase the sample size as previously mentioned, but also provide a wider range of genes.
Another study could pertain to the NFPA and the increase in ADH that was observed. The paper did not mention possible reasons for this, and it would be interesting to see the effects of this increase on body functions, as well as possible treatments.
The authors also suggest that future studies should be conducted to further determine the effect of human growth hormone in brain trauma patients with quality of life being the parameter in question.
References:
[1] Cocchi, D., Locatelli, V., Muller, E.E. (Eds.). (1993). Growth Homone and Somatomedins during Lifespan. Germany: Springer-Verlag.
[2] Daughaday, W.H., Harvey, S., Scanes, C.G., (1995). Growth Hormone. Florida, USA: CRC Press.
[3] Pang, P.K.T., Scanes, C.G., Schreibman, M.P. (1993). The Endocrinology of Growth, Development, and Metabolism in Vertebrates. San Diego, California: Academic Press, Inc.